ParkHowell.com

Archive for the ‘Greenwashing’ Category

Is Your Sustainability Message Believable?

906_thirsty-hummer-ad

Do you think the fur industry is green?

Does Nestle Waters really care about conservation?

Can the Hummer possibly be more thirsty for adventure than gas?

If you’re leading with a message of sustainability, the shoe must first fit. In an earlier article, I wrote about our three-legged bar stool test for sustainable marketing. Is your green marketing “Approachable,” Believable,” and “Doable?” In that piece I covered “approachability.” Now let’s talk “believability.”

Believability is about congruity. The above green marketing claims are simply not believable extensions of the advertiser.

Clorox went to great lengths, including product testing by groups like the EPA and the Sierra Club, before they launched their much-applauded Green Works line of cleaning products. They knew that for Clorox, historically a bleach-producing company, to be believable with the eco-conscious consumer, that they had to be completely transparent and insure that their products were not only green, but worked well.

Click on the image to test your carfun footprint

Click on the image to test your carfun footprint

Where Hummer puts the breaks on its sustainability believability, Mini Cooper completely outperforms in this brand position. The runabout’s “Carfun Footprint” campaign brilliantly attaches the brand’s engineering features to believable green driving attributes.

They put a nice spin on the notion of reducing your carbon footprint by selling the fact that you can have fun doing it too.

Kohler’s “Save Water America” campaign offers another terrific example of believable green marketing.

The water conservation education promotion donates $1 worth of water-efficient products to Habitat for Humanity for every person who takes the short water quiz on their site. Their goal is to donate $1 million in water efficient products that will outfit about 600 Habitat for Humanity homes.

Click on the image to take your toilet test

Click on the image to take your toilet test

Kohler’s actions are stronger than their words. Here are the six things they’re doing that are really smart, AND believable.

  1. Kohler is selling by educating: The quiz highlights the fact that nearly 50% of all toilets in America (about 100 million) are old school and waste at least two gallons of water with EVERY flush.
  2. They found a fun way to talk about your toilet: How else do you engage customers about retrofitting their toilets than to literally have toilets rain down on you during the quiz. It’s kind of cool. Plus, they direct you to toilet rebate programs in your state where you can turn in your old toilet for a new, water-efficient one through your town or city.
  3. They make water conservation interesting: Saving water isn’t always the most romantic subject. Kohler does a nice job here of engaging the visitor about the importance of water conservation throughout the home.
  4. A tangible and relevant approach to cause marketing: Teaming with Habitat for Humanity is a natural extension of the promotion. Kohler started with $500,000 in seed money, and have had about 4,500 hits to their quiz.
  5. Demonstrating industry leadership: Kohler products are inherently about water use, and now more than ever, water efficiency. By helping us all be greener (or bluer) through product demonstration, education, and cause marketing, Kohler is doing what an industry leader should: Providing the technology and education to make us all more environmentally sensitive consumers.
  6. Singular focus on toilets: Too often marketers try to accomplish too much with any one promotion.  Kohler could’ve also promoted low flow shower heads and faucet aerators as other important ways to save water in your bathroom, but that would’ve diluted their message. It’s all about toilets.

Who do you think does a credible job of sustaining their green marketing with believable promotion and action? Who do you think doesn’t?

Post to Twitter

Green Marketing’s Six Deadly Sins of Greenwashing

How to Avoid Greenwashing Damnation

Be careful. Less than reputable "green" claims will sneak up and bite you.

Über hyperbole is everywhere. Especially in green marketing. So how do you avoid the damnation of being tagged a “Greenwasher” by using false or disingenuous green claims?

My friend Michael Gold of Florida branding and package design firm, Gold Forest, sent me this great Marketing Green article this morning: “Just Tell the Truth.”

It seems like such obvious advice that you wonder why it even needs to be mentioned, let alone have an entire post written about the subject. Don’t we all know and follow THE social media buzzword of 2009: “Transparency!”

Apparently not.

In the article they cover the six sins of greenwashing:

  1. The “Sin of Hidden Trade-off” This is like a 100% organic cotton shirt imprinted with a toxic dye.
  2. The “Sin of No Proof” When consumers have no way of verifying a claim.
  3. The “Sin of Vagueness” Be specific!
  4. The “Sin of Irrelevance” Using meaningless claims like “CFC-Free.” Chloroflourocarbons were banned in the 1980’s.
  5. The “Sin of Fibbing” Mark Twain once said, “A lie can run around the world six times while the truth is still trying to put on its pants.”
  6. The “Sin of Lesser of Two Evils” Ever hear of organic cigarettes?

So how do you avoid greenwashing damnation? According to post author Gil Friend, president and CEO of Natural Logic, you assess which of your products and services are honesty worthy of green claims. You make sure your current green claims are sound, legal and informative. You ask customers what aspects of “green” are most important to them. And finally, you consider the costs and benefits of having your green claims formally certified by a third party.

What green marketing “sins” have you seen out there?

(Upon further research after I initially posted this article, I found TerraChoice, the environmental marketing firm that created the six deadly sins. And now they’ve added a seventh: “The Sin of Worshiping False Labels.” You can download the study findings here.)

Post to Twitter

Did Greenpeace’s Environmental Marketing on Mt. Rushmore Work, Or Did It Fall On Its Face?

rushmore

Believe me, I’m a sucker for good old fashioned stunt marketing. So it’s no wonder that Greenpeace caught my attention on Wednesday. They draped a 2,300 sq. ft. banner down the side of Lincoln’s noggin on Mount Rushmore. According to the proudly arrested Matt Leonard on his blog, they…

“…hung this banner on the opening day of the G8 meetings in Italy, and while the Senate looks to debate the Waxman-Markey bill - the first piece of comprehensive climate legislation in the US (and industry and many Democrats have rendered the bill more harmful than helpful).”

CNN captured the stunt as it happened and interviewed park-goers to get their reaction. Judging by the anger, makes you wonder if Greenpeace’s ambitious bit of environmental marketing actually generated positive sentiment to their cause and global warming?

One thing’s for sure, they could’ve used better creative direction to make the banner  resonate more with the commoner. Perhaps a thought bubble above Lincoln that said, “Is it hot out here, or is it just me?” Now that’s the kind of stuff the National park visitor can appreciate, and it would’ve gotten a few chuckles from the parking lot.

What do you think? Does this make Greenpeace look silly, radical, relevant, important, thought provoking, what…?

Post to Twitter

National Bank of Arizona is Putting its Environmental Efforts Under a Solar Magnifying Glass

sun-photo

Have you seen the spots for Regions Bank’s new LifeGreen Checking & Savings program? What’s green about their new account? Nothing different than any other bank. They’ve just slapped some green marketing onto what has become standard operating procedures for most banks: Electronic checking (saves paper), and if you have to have printed checks, they’ll print them on recycled paper.

picture-3Oh, and when you open an account you a get a free reusable shopping tote.

National Bank of Arizona (NBA), on the other hand, is putting their money where their green mouth is. NBA recently announced a joint venture with SolarCity and First Solar to build a 222 kilowatt (DC) solar installation in Phoenix; the city’s second largest commercial solar installation to date. The project is one of the first to use Tempe-based First Solar’s advanced thin film modules. The solar systems will consist of 2,960 First Solar modules installed atop NBA’s carports. It is expected to produce more than 350,000 kilowatt-hours of solar electricity annually, enough to power approximately 20-30 Phoenix-area homes.

The project was made possible, in part, thanks to an incentive from the Salt River Project (SRP) EarthWise Solar Energy program.

image_in1

Tempe-based Fisrt Solar's advanced thin film solar modules

NBA’s new First Solar system should allow the bank to offset the emission of more than 11 million pounds of greenhouse gases over its lifetime, the equivalent of planting more than 6,400 trees, or taking more than 1,400 cars off the road for a year. Bank employees and customers will be able to view on a lobby internet kiosk live data showing how much electricity the system generates, how much pollution it prevents and how much money it saves.

All this in addition to eBanking and check printed on recycled paper.

Where Regions Bank is boardering on greenwashing, NBA is becoming a financial industry leader in sustainability. Not just by offering some flimsy green services, but by doing.  This subsidiary of Zions Bancorporation in the sunny Southwest is leveraging the environment for green growth, versus attempting to capitalize on a growing trend of greener consumers.

Post to Twitter

How Sustainable is Your Sustainability Message?

Is your green brand, message or platform relevant? Can it stand the test of time? Does anyone care? We’ve always put these questions to the famous three-legged green bar stool test: Is your green marketing “Approachable,” “Believable,” and “Doable”?

© Park&Co 2009

© Park&Co 2009

This post covers the first leg: Is your green brand approachable? We believe that changing the average shopper to an eco-conscious consumer is not prompted by the radical fringes. Most people can’t see themselves plying the north Atlantic in a Zodiac saving whales, or huddled in a make-shift tree fort hugging a Sequoia in Berkley, or chained to a five-ton Caterpillar to keep a developer from blading the desert.

If you and your brand are going to entice eco-friendly behavioral change, then you absolutely most be a welcoming, guiding inspiration in your customer’s life.

One example of this approachability is Green Depot. It is a consumer focused “Home Depot” for green building and remodeling. The Wall Street Journal said, “With its boutique feel, the store is laser-focused on the consumer – not so much builders. And while protecting the environment is part of the shill, marketing puts heavy emphasis on keeping consumers healthier and saving them money on heating, cooling and other energy needs.”

The Green Depot gets it. They are both an online and bricks and mortar boutique that makes it fun and easy for consumers to embrace sustainable green products in their lives and homes.

patagoniaPatagonia has been “getting green” since the start. Their Footprint Chronicles allows you to track the impact of a specific Patagonia product from design through delivery. This is a welcome transparency and differentiator in the consumer products industry that allows you, the consumer, to make an educated choice on how and where to buy your apparel, and what tangible impact you may have on the environment with your decision.

And to prove eco-consumption isn’t just for the well-heeled, Walmart released the somewhat surprising findings from their green consumer survey just before Earth Day. It revealed an adoption rate increase of 66 percent from last year in its sustainability Live Better Index, which has been tracking consumers’ decisions to purchase five key eco-friendly products since April 2007. This growth in the sustainability index shows that concern for the environment has a growing presence in shopping baskets of the retailer’s 200 million annual customers.

Three of the 10 Ways to Measure the “Approachability” of Your Green Brand

  1. Make it Neighborly: Does your consumer feel like they have a vested interest in the promotion and outcome of your cause by purchasing or investing in your product or service? It’s that old adage: “Think Globally, Act Locally.”
  2. Make it Friendly: Are you selling from fear tactics, or are you helping to empower your consumer? We recommend empowerment, because change happens when people feel they have a choice that can positively impact an outcome.
  3. Make it Inclusive: Social norms almost always trump individual altruism. If everyone else appears to be doing it, then so should I. There is a terrific article in The Atlantic about “Social Proof,” that illustrates this concept.

Three of the 10 Pitfalls That Make Your Green Brand “Unapproachable”

berkeley-tree-sitters-protest-photo

Berkeley Tree Sitter

  1. Far-flung Causes: Although groups like The Water Project have an important mission of bringing clean water to Africa, it is so removed from the average American’s life experience that it’s difficult to compete with consumer mind-share based on more geographically immediate causes.
  2. Over Glamourization: When Animal Planet is trying to get its viewers to live vicariously through modern day eco-pirates like they feature on Whale Wars, it sort of sinks the entire eco-genre into the silly, silly fringes.
  3. Snootiness: Prius has a tremendous following of eco-evangelists of all shades of green.  Tesla Motors does not. One costs around $35k, the other $100k. Enough said.

Is your green brand approachable, believable and doable? Know of one that is?

You can learn “How To Reduce Your Carbon and Hype Footprints” AND make your green brand approachable, believable and doable, with my SlideShare presentation:


Post to Twitter