ParkHowell.com

Posts Tagged ‘Dr. Sam Ham’

The Survival of the Fittest Green Marketers Hinges on Who Tells the Best Stories

Dr. Charles Darwin and the Survival of the Fittest

Dr. Charles Darwin as an ape, 1871 Hornet Magazine

The recession is ransacking everything and causing the extinction of many great green and environmental causes. I’ve been researching charitable foundations lately. Their nest eggs, from which their contributions are born, are as devastated as your 401k. Giving is down, and non-profits are looking for new ways to raise funds. If you’re green cause is lacking sustainability due to a drop in donations, then start to rethink how you’re asking and interacting with your donors and customers.

Tell a More Sustainable Green Story

This is the third article in a series on Dr. Sam Ham’s engaging work on “Thematic Communications.” I asked Dr. Ham if he’d offer some examples of thematic storytelling. He pointed to a conservation campaign on Galapagos Islands, which I found only too fitting given Dr. Charles Darwin’s work there.

Dr. Ham writes: My experience has been that the key to designing successful behavior-change campaigns is that we must not enter the situation thinking only about why people are not doing as we want, but rather, we must become skilled at uncovering the reasons that they would do as we want.  Even some of my colleagues have a little trouble with this mental gymnastic.

There are many, but an example is one in the Galapagos Islands I had the pleasure to design.  A well-known small eco-cruise operator, Lindblad Expeditions, wanted to increase donations by its guests to a special fund (the Galapagos Conservation Fund or GCF) which was set up in collaboration with the Charles Darwin Foundation to direct much-need financial support to on-the-ground conservation in that fragile archipelago.  Based on messages more or less intuited by the staff and opportunistically delivered over the course of a seven-day cruise, they were raising about USD $1,800 per week from their 80 passengers (40 couples usually).  After doing their homework and developing a message package based on the beliefs Lindblad guests actually had about the behavior (i.e., donating to the GCF), we were able to increase donations the next year by 270% (to over $6,700 per week).  Today the GCF generates close to $500,000 per year and has single handedly financed the successful eradication of introduced goats and pigs on one of the archipelago’s most threatened islands.

It is clear that in order to successfully apply what we’re learning about persuasive communication and behavioral influence, we must better understand the reasons people would have for doing the right thing, not just the reasons they have for doing the wrong thing.

In the Galapagos campaign, as well as in many others, this has been the key to getting the homework right.  The Office of Integrated Sustainability Services in Townsville, Australia is rapidly becoming a world model in applying this approach at the community level.  Teaming up with Ergon Energy, they’re tackling a suite of behaviors related to energy and water consumption with the aim of becoming a world model for sustainable cities.  I think the impact of their work is potentially far-reaching both in Australia and the rest of the world.

Do you have an example of thematic communications at work? What’s your story?

“Once Upon a Time…” The Four Most Formidable Words in Sustainable Marketing

1robots-gal-terminator

"I'll be back!"

If you have two hours to kill, would you choose to sit through a powerpoint presentation on the benefits of using all natural products to clean your office, or watch the film, “Terminator?”

Even if you’re not a big Arnold fan, don’t appreciate science fiction, and hate violence in movies, I still bet you’d be drawn to high definition entertainment over low resolution powerpoint.

This was the question I posed to a gentlemen yesterday. He showed me his ads and marketing materials laden with facts. No emotional triggers. No differentiators. No reasons why his company will help me sleep better at night. It was all about how “green” his cleaning service is.

Being “green” these days is no longer a chief brand differentiator in many industries, especially in commercial cleaning. It’s a commodity. It’s a little bit like having a neurological hospital trumpet that they have the smartest brain surgeons in town. I’m afraid in their business that having bright cranial docs is the cost of entry. They’re a commodity. And we all know what happens to commodities in our customers’ minds. Our services are devalued, get subjected to bidding wars, and our prices resemble the aftermath of a cyborg encounter.

Since people buy with emotion, then rationalize their purchase with facts, why do so many green marketers holster their most formidable weapon: Telling great stories?

Earlier this week I introduced you to Dr. Sam Ham, and his thesis of “Thematic Communication” to coax behavior change. In this second in a series of articles on his work in environmental communications, I asked Dr. Ham for his description of thematic communication.

“It’s simply a way of thinking about communication that is based on the idea that persuasion is about making people think their own thoughts.  We must provoke people to think and make their own meanings with respect to the message if we want to increase our likelihood of success over the long term.

“A ‘theme’ is simply the message.  It’s like the moral of a story, or the main conclusion a communicator would like her/his audience to draw from the message.  These morals and conclusions are meanings made between the ears of the individual.  The more strongly relevant the message is (the more it connects to what the audience — not just the communicator — already cares about, things that matter to them), the greater the likelihood they will attend to and process it.  The more they think, the more persuasive the message can be.  And if the thoughts they think are consistent with or supportive of the kind of behavior being advocated, that behavior stands a greater chance of ensuing.

“We must not try to intuit what this moral might or should be.  To enjoy our greatest chances of success, we must derive it from our ‘homework,’ which allows us to isolate the truly important beliefs our audience has about the behavior, and specifically, which of those beliefs is different between compliers and non-compliers.  Our theme needs to target those beliefs and we need to craft it, package it, and deliver it to our audiences in a compelling way, connecting it to what matters to them.

Dr. Ham included this 70-page guide, “Promoting Persuasion in Protected Areas,” that takes you through creating thematic communication in your campaign.

So if you’re selling anything from green commercial cleaning services, to top-notch brain surgeons, to a behavior change that asks visitors, “Don’t feed the animals,” start by getting your story straight. Understand what motivates your customer emotionally. Then tell a tale that makes them think and compels them to action.

I will be telling my tale about “The Cold Shoulder of Social Media” and the tendency for its contributors to write as poweproint engineers as opposed to Spielbergian storytellers as a presenter at Social Media Arizona. If you’re in Tempe, AZ, stop by the MadCap theater. I’m at noon.

Are You a Green Marketing Weirdo Trying to Change the Behavior of Normal People?

039_8892

Are you truly embracing your market?

Dr. Sam Ham called me a, “Weirdo.” He’s a professor at the University of Idaho who has developed an interesting approach to storytelling to provoke behavior change.

I first learned of Dr. Ham from a green marketer in Queensland, Australia. Greg Bruce is the Executive Manager of Integrated Sustainability Services for the Townsville City Regional Council down under.

He sent me a note after reading my blog, and said: “I found much of your text and content “thematically” written and thought provoking. So one conclusion is that either you have done “thematic interpretation/communication” with Dr Sam Ham… or you are intuitively as a social marketer tapping into thematic communication styles – which are opposite of the way most people (and marketers too) are taught, think, act and communicate – and I know as I deal with a lot of them (and they are not thematic communicators).”

Wow, do you think I was intrigued? So I started doing some digging on Dr. Ham. What I found is another body of work that backs up the theory that “Stories sell!”

In this case, it’s how you successfully promote behavior change in sustainable and environmental causes through the use of what the good doctor has coined, “Thematic Communication.”

In fact, I’ll let Dr. Ham do most of the explaining. Over the course of the next several articles here, you will meet Dr. Ham and learn ways to apply his approach of “Thematic Communication” in your campaigns.

Let’s start with my first question:

What is the number one mistake people make when trying to communicate or promote a particular behavior change?

Dr. Sam Ham: Professor of COmmunication Psychology, Dept. of Conservation Social Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho

Dr. Sam Ham: Professor of Communication Psychology, Dept. of Conservation Social Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho

Dr. Sam Ham: “The biggest, by far, is that we assume we’re representative of the people whose behavior we want to influence.  This leads us to intuit messages out of the blue and to make arbitrary choices about communication appeals based on what we think would be “influential” to us.  Research and much practical experience tells us that people like us are usually very different from our audiences in how we think and feel about things related to the behaviors we promote.

Even a moment’s reflection should convince us that if all those other people really thought and reasoned like we do, there would be little need to persuade them of anything.  They’d already be behaving like us.

A further caveat here is that since “all those other people” outnumber us, that by definition makes them “normal.”  So we have to face the reality that we weirdos (in the statistical sense) have taken it upon ourselves to make normal people more like us.  Just a thought in the name of ethical humility.”

A good example of this communication deficit between the “Weirdos” and “Normal” people is seen the 1968 movie, “Planet of the Apes.” Charlton Heston’s character, Ulysse, crash lands his space ship on a far flung planet that greatly resembles Earth. Ulysse, in the world he came from, is of course the dominant species. However, he discovers in the upside-down world he now inhabits that humans have been reduced to ape-like beings, while the apes run the place. Ulysse, according to my loose interpretation of Dr. Ham’s thesis above, represents the green marketer. The apes are the market. It’s not until Chuck gets in the heads of his ape captors-soon-to-be-patrons, that his survival is assured.

I suppose the same holds true for any marketing effort.

As marketers, we often think we have all of the answers – we’re the normal ones – even as we haven’t taken the time to hear the important questions posed by our customers. We become bloated with industry jargon and tech speak, when what we really need is a good tale that reveals the truth about our cause and why people need to act. Only then, through understanding that comes with thematic communication, will we be effective and sustainable.

Ok, so Dr. Ham didn’t call me a “Weirdo” directly to my face. But I’ve been guilty of the “Know-it-all” marketing syndrome he references above.  Have you?

In my next post in this series, we will unveil the character of thematic communication through the eyes of Dr. Ham with great examples of how it works.

Everything I Know About Social Media I Learned in Kindergarten

What story can you tell about this cat, kid and goldfish?

What story can you tell about this cat, kid and goldfish?

I’ve been at this social media thing for two years now. Just moving into the first grade. Yes, I had to repeat SM kindergarten. I find it’s as finicky as a five-year-old.

The “experts” through their blogs, ebooks and Slideshares, have been trying to teach me the trending. The numbers. Why you’re supposed to have a gajillion followers on Twitter or you’re not cool on the playground. How to game the AdAge 150 ranking. What I’m supposed to be posting on Facebook. How I should be scheduling tweets.  FYI, SEO aids ROI. My Technorati training wheels keep falling off. I find StumbleUpon aptly named.  Digg this! “Aaaah the madness!” I cried.

For a media that’s supposed to be about “The conversation,” all I hear about are “The Numbers.” But the numbers tend to belie the conversational strength of social media. These particular stats are from “Groundswell”:

Only 18% of people online actually create anything to share, while 25% of those online are “Critics,” meaning they actually comment on the “Creators” work.  The groups overlap, so a lot of those critics are also the creators. What’s it all mean to the “Sister Mary John” school boy inside me? There not a hell of a lot of “Conversations” going on out there. Most internet denizens are more comfortable being wallflowers as they peruse from the shadows. Is that why the numbers are so dam important (Sorry Sister)? That’s called a “Broadcast” medium, not one that is actively engaged in conversation.

People Don’t Read, They Scan.

That’s bull-hockey. They don’t read because very few of us have something decent to say. Or say it very interestingly. Including, apparently, me. My “numbers” are in the tank.

Until now.

I’m going back to what all kids, including those inside of us, like: Stories!

The moral of this post moving forward is: “Stories sell.”

You want to be sustainable? Tell better stories.

I’m leaving the “How to’s,” and “The 10 Reasons Why,” and the “Lists” and the abbreviated text to the engineers and the PowerPointers. That’s all low resolution storytelling, and it’s no longer for me.

I’m not interested in folks strafing my blog anymore. There’s little interaction and no engagement. It’s not worth my time, or yours.

Instead, I’m going back to what I do best: Telling better stories. And I’m pulling from a whole new set of experts, including Steven Pressfield and his remarkable book, “The War of Art.” His “Writing Wednesdays” tip is a terrific inspiration for storytellers.

Did you know you can overlay the structure of a screen play onto everything from a Cardinal’s football game to a compelling sermon? I’ve learned this by studying Blake Snyder’s screen play bible, “Save the Cat.” Now I’m into his “Save the Cat Goes to the Movies,” where Snyder, adding credence to his structural thesis, outlines the  “Beat Sheet” for 50 influential movies, with another 50 films referenced throughout the book.

Just finishing David Mamet’s, “Three Uses of the Knife: On the Nature and Purpose of Drama”.

Up next: Seth Godin’s, “All Marketers Tell Stories,” while studying über screenwriting professor, Robert Kckee’s, “Story,” on the substance, structure, style, and the principles of telling better stories.

And finally, I’m going to share with you the intriguing work of Dr. Sam Ham (Yah, I know, a name right out of Dr. Seuss) and his moving work in “Thematic Communication” in environmental marketing and sustainability.

Why the bibliography? To underscore to you that I’m furiously serious. Stories can intrigue, incite, educate and move people. I’ve known that all my life. Just Google, “I’ll raise your a rabbit,” and you’ll see what I mean. But, like the “Apple in the Road” plot twist in a “Golden Fleece” movie genre as described by Snyder, somehow, in all the glitz and glamor of social media and its ROI and numbers, and scanning, and brevity, we have lost site of the power of telling a great story.

When was the last time you heard a good joke? I bet it’s been awhile. Email has killed the craft of joke telling. It’s not what you’re telling, it’s how you tell it. Email takes the human dimension out of a great set-up and punchline. And if we’re not careful, the pruned back, PowerPoint ideology of blog writing is going to kill the story. At least the online version of storytelling.

But where there’s conflict, there’s opportunity. Plate tectonics create both earthquakes and mountain ranges.

I’m going to be telling my story, “The Cold Shoulder of Social Media: Why it hasn’t worked for me, and probably won’t for you, unless… at the Social Media Arizona conference SMAZ on January 25 at the Mad Cap Theaters in Tempe.

And get this: Fred Von Graf, SMAZ’s producer, has even included me  as an “Expert.” I’m proud and honored to be listed with the likes of Jason Baer of Convince and Convert, and Greg Chapman of Sitewire. They’re the real experts that know how to operationalize social media, and they both have their own great stories to tell.

Mine is about what has – and more importantly, what has not – worked for me using social media. And I can tell you, whether you’re communicating online or off, it ALL begins with how well you tell a tale.

What’s your story?